*Official* B1G In-Season Thread
- Thread starter boilerzz
- Start date
The Shameless reference is top notch
5 double ipas (8% abv) deep while trying to get some work done.
Edit: Two Roads: Roads To Ruin is my friend
Not my point. Fun? No doubt. A clear delineator between being a good coach or not. No way. Being a good team or not. No. Fun? Absolutely. The setup to get to a FF is too variable to determine the best 4 teams. Best of 3 or best of 5 definitely. One and done...no way. In Painters case he is relatively young and arguably a couple of key injuries from having EE or FF teams. Doesn’t change who he is...he’s a really good coach that fields competitive teams consistently. I’m clearly in the minority on this subject...doesn’t bother me. I’m fine with my position.
Worst game I’ve ever seen in person. That said, I secretly kinda enjoyed the chaos.
I made two charity bets at the beginning of the year. Won both. So shut the fvck with this holier than thou act.
Last edited:
He’s literally calling people pvssies for not “donating” aka betting sports with him. Fvck off Hail.
No one gives a fvck dude. You made a bet and lost. You don’t get to tell me what I do with my money. I chose to not partake in this particular bet tonight. Who the fvck cares? Trying to make me out as a bad person for not betting on a basketball game is a joke.
Play some defense bitch and we won’t hit 12-28
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset
Well-Known Member
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset
Well-Known Member
Not really. We just outplayed you.
Maybe you should've hit 12 threes if you wanted to win......bMORE seems to think that's the key.
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset
Well-Known Member
Not really. We just outplayed you.
Maybe you should've hit 12 threes if you wanted to win......bMORE seems to think that's the key.
Teske played 13 minutes because of some
B/S calls. Game changer.
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset
Well-Known Member
I disagree but that's because I didn't watch the game. Therefore.....................
Last edited:
His arms weren't straight up and instead came over the top of Morgan. With how they were calling the game all night, imo it was a good no call since they hadn't called that the whole night. But technically, it was a textbook example of what over the back is.
Like you should! There's a reason the final 4 is such a big deal and everyone here understands this except 1 person.
I'm hearing a lot of losing here....if Beilein keeps this up he might drop down to 15th to 20th range instead of the 11th or 12th spot he's currently holding.
Looks pretty damn clean to me man, wasn’t even touching Morgan. Textbook over the back would be Morgan boxing Haarms out and Haarms jumping/reaching over him, clearly not the case here.
One of the best sports memory I've had was the 2002 national championship game run IU had. That Duke game still ranks above the birth of 2 of my children!
I actually had picked IU to make it to the championship game and then to lose to Maryland. IIRC, i was only one of like 200 people who had the correct championship game lineup on the ESPN bracket challenge. I finished i believe around 12th because of that pick and is ny far the highest I've ever been on any of those national bracket challenges.
Um...can you not see that his arms aren't straight up and down? Which then makes his arms go over the top of Morgan while his body is I to Morgan?
Looks pretty damn clean to me man, wasn’t even touching Morgan. Textbook over the back would be Morgan boxing Haarms out and Haarms jumping/reaching over him, clearly not the case here.
But honestly, not sure why its important to you? I've already said that it was a good non call...so what's the point?
It’s not a big deal but you keep saying it was over the back and it just wasn’t called, that is not over the back.
Lol God damn...you're one triggered little bitch, aren't you?
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but when a defender walls up, but his arm's instead of being straight up...ends up coming down a little and goes into the offensive player....who will get called for a foul?
I'm really not understanding why you don't think this is OTB, but if Morgan was on the ground still, it would be? Not talking shit here...I really don't understand your thinking here. OTB can happen if the under player is jumping for a rebound....not sure if your saying that it can't happen in your last post, or if I misunderstood you.
I don’t think it’s over the back because Haarms didn’t go over his back lol nothing too complex here man. Morgan didn’t box Haarms out & Haarms didn’t jump over him, his arms didn’t go over his shoulders flailing for the ball, he didn’t even touch Morgan. If you really get the impression that his arm isn’t going straight up to the ball there and just gets to the ball before Morgan then idk what to tell you. I’m sure you played basketball at some point and know that would have been the lamest over the back call. It was just the classic offensive tip in.
The refs manufactured a foul against Cowan at the end. His clean steal was called a foul because they wanted Iowa to win. The refs tried cheating for Iowa, but the better team came into Carver and beat Iowa and the refs.
It's a good thing Iowa plays no defense and Maryland capitalized on it by hitting an absolutely average 42% from 3.
Agree to disagree here. But like I said before, I'm fine with it not being called in that situation.
