ADVERTISEMENT

Kenpom #33 Minnesota (13-16)

if they were as good as that ranking then the should not be at the bottom of the PAC 12 so your type of logic is flawed. sorry but you don't reward a team for losing a loss is still a loss.

not when other teams don't get rewarded for beating higher ranked teams,

a winning team should get a better rating for beating higher rated teams.

to use Iowa they are #34 in spite of 9 quad 1 wins
7 wins vs top 25 teams
the most by any team in D1 BB

there is no logical reason for them not to be a top 15 let alone top 20 team. this weekend they have a chance to record their 10th quad 1 win and 8th top 25 win.

there is one team with 11 quad 1 wins and 1 maybe 2 with 10 quad 1 wins, but none of them are even or ahead of them in top 25 wins.

the net is hot garbage. it needs a MAJOR OVERHAUL.

Your posting style needs a major overhaul.
 
I would have to go with Garza, although they are completely different players.
Kansas 4 guards create too much trouble, tonight try shot lights out from 3, still only lead by 2 at
Your posting style needs a major overhaul.
I think he posts from an older blackberry. Only excuse I can give him. Should seriously follow his cfball recruiting posts. If you have the patience.
 
Kenporn is a joke.
the NET is just as bad,

Strong take.

very very little.

to me when a team beats 2 team rated higher than them and the 2 teams they beat stay the same and the winning team stays the same that shows just how worthless they are and the clincher when that team lost to a lower rated team they drop 6 spots.

talk about showing how bad that ranking is.

Getting sort of specific here, but still bringing it.

one that does not use a point spread, one that rates them on wins and losses vs their opponents,

sorry when a team beats a top 15 team and does rise. there is a problem, then again that same team beats a top 20 and does not rise. there is a MAJOR problem in that system.

teams that beat top 20 level teams deserve to go up especially when that team is a top 30 team and are still behind them in the rating.

This doesn't seem like a random example.

now you explain to me how a team that is 13-16 can still be a top 50 team.
then you have a team that was 15-14 upsets a top 30 team and they go from #33 to #32 like how does a team with a record of 15-14 even be rated #33 in the 1st place.

Okay, this is starting to feel really personal.

if they were as good as that ranking then the should not be at the bottom of the PAC 12 so your type of logic is flawed. sorry but you don't reward a team for losing a loss is still a loss.

not when other teams don't get rewarded for beating higher ranked teams,

a winning team should get a better rating for beating higher rated teams.

to use Iowa they are #34 in spite of 9 quad 1 wins
7 wins vs top 25 teams
the most by any team in D1 BB

there is no logical reason for them not to be a top 15 let alone top 20 team. this weekend they have a chance to record their 10th quad 1 win and 8th top 25 win.

there is one team with 11 quad 1 wins and 1 maybe 2 with 10 quad 1 wins, but none of them are even or ahead of them in top 25 wins.

the net is hot garbage. it needs a MAJOR OVERHAUL.

There it is!
 
The Big ten has 11 of the top 30 teams in the country via Kenpom
 
ADVERTISEMENT