Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t wear t-shirts. i graduated from there if you need to update your spreadsheet.Is this the guy who wouldn’t own his Missouri fandom?
I don’t wear t-shirts. i graduated from there if you need to update your spreadsheet.
I’ve laughed HARD at 2 of your posts this morning. The other about the silver haired dude. Please post more!
CBB is the worst way to determine a champion.
You can’t be serious. The best way to determine a championship would be a tournament consisting of the top 16 teams. Not saying I necessarily want them to do that because March madness is really fun.
Well if so and so can't make it to the Sweet 16, they didn't deserve to be there in the first place.You can’t be serious. The best way to determine a championship would be a tournament consisting of the top 16 teams. Not saying I necessarily want them to do that because March madness is really fun.
Yeah because upsets dont ever happen. You think Kansas was the best team in 88?Well if so and so can't make it to the Sweet 16, they didn't deserve to be there in the first place.
What do you think the reason is the Jayhawks have had a couple of slip-ups this season since Texas found a way?If Adidas only knew how to keep their business secret.
Yeah because upsets dont ever happen. You think Kansas was the best team in 88?
Sounds like you would prefer that AP #1 banner over actually earning it by winning the tournament.Yeah because upsets dont ever happen. You think Kansas was the best team in 88?
You can’t be serious. The best way to determine a championship would be a tournament consisting of the top 16 teams. Not saying I necessarily want them to do that because March madness is really fun.
Yea but then the only teams who would make the series are the ones who were ranked high preseason or lose less games than everyone else, which would by and far go right back to preseason rankings unless the 16th ranked team just happened to have a better record than the 17th ranked team.
Take Louisville as an example. We are 10-3, with no real wow wins, 1 bad loss, 1 ugly af loss. But if we’d been top 10 preseason we’d still likely still be there, just bc we only have 3 losses atm. Now I don’t think we are a top 10 team atm, just using us as an example. Kansas would be the other end, I doubt they would still be ranked if they weren’t ranked fairly high in the preseason.
It always seems to go back to preseason rankings if the number of losses is similar. Plus then what about conf tourneys?
Trim it down to the Final Four then make it round robin, double elimination.I don’t think trimming the field way down would change much. Best way to determine a champ wouid be to play series.
ACC is awful this year according to the "experts"^^^this. FSU was even ranked preseason, has only 2 losses, wins over Indiana, UF, UNC, Louisville, and Clemson, and we might be lucky to be in the 21-25 range this week.
So maybe the NCAA should give out a "******** was the best team, but lost in the tournament" banner, too.It's a great way of deciding a champion, but an awful one of deciding the best team (which too many people think both are the same when they rarely are).
So maybe the NCAA should give out a "******** was the best team, but lost in the tournament" banner, too.
ACC is awful this year according to the "experts"
Sometimes they are wrong.
This doesn't have anything to do with Kansas
You think Florida State would have done better with KUs schedule.
Kansas does have wins over Texas Tech, WVU and Creighton
No he’s saying if FSU was top 10 preseason they’d likely be ranked like 3rd right now with the exact same results.
And it’s obv a flawed system when teams like duke and UK were ranked so highly preseason. And I’m not saying I could pick em any better bc you can’t truly gauge a team until you see it imo.
If they started the rankings after New Years or something, maybe but then teams would jsut schedule soft until then. Preseason rankings play a huge part in college sports, football even more so bc they only take 4. So the less you take the more the preseason rankings will matter in maintaining a ranking to make the “series”
The little bit of schadenfreude I get out of UK’s mounting losses this season is that it makes everyone’s SoS take on water.Kansas does have wins over Texas Tech, WVU and Creighton
Yeah that is what I said. Great call KevinSounds like you would prefer that AP #1 banner over actually earning it by winning the tournament.
I like the tournament as is. The best team doesn’t always win, but most of the time it’s a really solid squad that is playing their best basketball at the right time.
So literally what I said
Sounds like it, since your argument is that the tournament should only be 16 teams. Is that your opinion because some high seeded KU teams have been bounced in the 1st or 2nd round recently? How would you even determine who those 16 teams are? I would love to hear that.Yeah that is what I said. Great call Kevin
Wichita state 2014Sure, upsets happen. But if you’re goal is to crown the best overall team then cutting it to 16 teams isn’t going to make it much better. Upsets will still happen. How often does the top overall seed lose before the sweet 16? UVA in 2018 and KU in 2010 immediately come to mind, but I’m struggling to come up with many others.
But on another note, if you are the best overall team and you lose in the first two games to an overmatched opponent, then I think you’ve shown you don’t deserve it anyway.
Obviously you cant read. I said I dont want them to do that. I am stating a fact that it is the worst way to determine a champion compared to all other sports. The KU teams that "should have" won a title didnt lose in the first or second round except the 2010 team. This has nothing to do with Kansas.Sounds like it, since your argument is that the tournament should only be 16 teams. Is that your opinion because some high seeded KU teams have been bounced in the 1st or 2nd round recently? How would you even determine who those 16 teams are? I would love to hear that.
Then why is it the worst way to determine a champion? If a high seed gets bounced in the 1st or 2nd round they obviously weren't that bulletproof and didn't deserve to win it all anyway. The worst way to determine a champion is how football does it, by the way.Obviously you cant read. I said I dont want them to do that. I am stating a fact that it is the worst way to determine a champion compared to all other sports. The KU teams that "should have" won a title didnt lose in the first or second round except the 2010 team. This has nothing to do with Kansas.
So maybe the NCAA should give out a "******** was the best team, but lost in the tournament" banner, too.
HAHAHAHA now that is funny. Football is the worst? IDC if you are talking NFL or College. You couldnt be more wrong. For the record I think college should have 8 teams in just for the fun of it.Then why is it the worst way to determine a champion? If a high seed gets bounced in the 1st or 2nd round they obviously weren't that bulletproof and didn't deserve to win it all anyway. The worst way to determine a champion is how football does it, by the way.
Man you really got us. It sucks being one of the 4 best programs in the country. I wouldnt rank us 1st. Tough life we live here as Kansas fans.Finally something Kansas can be first in