"pro gambler" that doesn't even "look at" objective rankings systems that are tried and true in the industry (in fact, they're so tried and true that you have to find a way not to rely on them to find value, but not looking at them at all? fvcking dumb)? Sure, why not.
You know what? I'm a "pro stock investor" that doesn't even bother to "look at . . . stupid shit" like EBITDA, return on equity, debt, or volatility.
Facts like objective measures of team strength? Facts like those objective measures having UK really close to where they are in the subjective rankings? Facts like adjusted efficiency margin? Facts like strength of schedule, adjusted offense, adjusted defense, tempo, luck... You know, things that take into account all the facts, and not just cherry-picked ones like, say, an individual game that you're clearly hung up on.
Why do we even consider 2005 UNC to be good? They lost at Santa Clara! #hawkit3113facts
Yeah, UK is really benefiting a whole *checks notes* 1-3 spots in the AP poll. Whelp, that settles it. Wrap it up, boys!
It's more about the lack of respect for some teams. Not really UK. You guys made it about you guys.
Do you think you deserve to be #12, at the moment?