ADVERTISEMENT

Can someone explain NET rankings…

AuHoosier420

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Oct 9, 2008
30,897
11,434
113
Auburn is 6. While lsu is 5. Auburn has more quad 1 wins. Auburn has More quad two wins. Have a much higher strength of schedule. We are higher in the RPI. And we just beat them by 15. Why is LSU higher?
 
You get penalized 1 point if your coach is a cheating scumbag. That is why Auburn is lower

gif.gif
 
Games are worth different amount of wins and losses depending on where it’s played. Road wins are worth more than neutral site wins, which are worth more than home wins.

Also factors in margin of victory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Montana81
Games are worth different amount of wins and losses depending on where it’s played. Road wins are worth more than neutral site wins, which are worth more than home wins.

Also factors in margin of victory.
So if you beat the shit out of crappy teams, it helps you more than beating a good team at home by a lot?
 
So if you beat the shit out of crappy teams, it helps you more than beating a good team at home by a lot?

If the win against the crappy team was on the road, probably.

The thing about the NET is that good and bad is relative to record. Beating an opponent that’s 20-3 looks better than beating an opponent that’s 12-11, even if the 12-11 team is actually ranked higher in the NET.

It’s a bit of a paradox where the actual RANK of a team you beat or lost to matters for quadrant purposes (and thus, resume purposes). But in terms of determining your own teams rank, the record of the opponent, the location of the game, and the margin of victory is what matters. The rank of your opponent does not factor into your SOS, the record of your opponent does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lurkeraspect84
Even though the formula might not be perfect, I do like the attempt of the selection committee to be more transparent. It helps teams "know where they are" ahead of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GE Nole
ADVERTISEMENT