But why sit him to save 5 wins, tops? It’s almost March. The season isn’t salvageable, especially with Trier gone.
Just saying if they believe the allegations, why is the school only suspending 1 of the associated parties. I get that there isn’t anything explicitly implicating Ayton, maybe I just don’t understand that logic
At the same time I can't fault Texas for sitting him.
Agreed, but if the allegations are true at Texas, than those games already won this season will be vacated- I would do what Zona is doing tonight- play them until the NCAA says no. Makes a mockery of the system but who knows....
If Ayton took money then Arizona will not be in the tourney. Doesn’t matter if they hold him out tonight or not.
They need to prove it first. So might as well play Ayton. It makes sense.
Arizona is putting Ayton in a bad situation tonight, he is going to hear it big time from the home crowd.
Abolish the NCAA, there are no rules and give Louisville their title back!
Exactly what I was thinking with MSU and Bridges. How in the hell could they have investigated everything and completely cleared him already? It's entirely possibly that there isn't any wrongdoing there, but no way in hell they investigated it all this quick.Sorry but it’s not possible ANY of these schools have investigated this & cleared kids this fast.
After the UNC fiasco I would tell the NCAA to kick rocks if they tried to punish my program.Agreed, but if the allegations are true at Texas, than those games already won this season will be vacated- I would do what Zona is doing tonight- play them until the NCAA says no. Makes a mockery of the system but who knows....
No cam newton was never proven to of been given money or to have even ever discussed money with Auburn. The only evidence was that his dad talked to a miss st. Booster at one time about them giving him money. No evidence ever came out on auburn at all like their is with Arizona here. The NCAA then changed the rules to say parents or reps cannot discuss pay to play.